Re: [fwAnalog] Would moving bind into a Chroot Jail cause this?

From: Balázs Bárány (balazs~AT~tud.at)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 19:14:46 CEST

• Next message: Alexander Borkowski: "[fwAnalog] Little bug in ipchains input filter?"
• Previous message: Craig: "RE:[fwAnalog] Would moving bind into a Chroot Jail cause this?"
• In reply to: Craig: "RE:[fwAnalog] Would moving bind into a Chroot Jail cause this?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

• Craig <craig~AT~datafx.com.au> [2003-07-17 11:13]:
  > I have deleted my lock file and still get the same errors.
  So the lock file is always recreated? Or has the location changed because of the chroot?

Anyway, that file is generated by analog, fwanalog doesn't have control on it. You might want to consult the Analog documentation or their mailing list.

> Unwanted logfile entries (because of a date range, EXCLUDE etc.): 9,630
This shows that Analog reads over all the data, but doesn't find any of today. Check that you have current firewall logs and they are accessible to fwanalog.

Regards

-- 
_________________________________________________________________________
Balázs Bárány       balazs~AT~tud.at        http://tud.at       ICQ 10747763

A good engineer will make considerable effort to avoid additional effort.

• Next message: Alexander Borkowski: "[fwAnalog] Little bug in ipchains input filter?"
• Previous message: Craig: "RE:[fwAnalog] Would moving bind into a Chroot Jail cause this?"
• In reply to: Craig: "RE:[fwAnalog] Would moving bind into a Chroot Jail cause this?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 13 2003 - 12:42:03 CEST